Conservatives, News, Op-Eds, Republicans

Top House Republican: Reagan Would Never Stand For Chemical Attacks

Former House Foreign Affairs Committee chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) went on Fox News and blasted President Obama’s slow response to the Syrian government’s alleged use of chemical weapons against civilians and rebel groups. She channeled the “great” Ronald Reagan, saying that he would have been more forceful in his response.

ROS-LEHTINEN: It is against the norms of international standards and to let something like this go unanswered, I think will weaken our resolve. I — I know that President Reagan would have never let this happen. He would stand up to this. And President Obama — the only reason he is consulting with Congress, he wants to blame somebody for his lack of resolve. We have to think like President Reagan would do and he would say chemical use is unacceptable.

Two things. First off, history paints another picture. In the 1980s, President Reagan took Iraq off the list of known terrorist countries after Saddam Hussein led the invasion of Iran. In subsequent years, The Reagan Administration provided weapons (illegally), intelligence, and explicit support to the Iraqis, in spite of the death toll reaching more than 1 million on both sides. Among the weapons used by the Iraqi military were sarin and mustard gas, which the United States knew about but helped Hussein anyway by pointing out strategic enemy positions that would have given Iran the edge to win the war. And in documents dated March 3, 1988, the Reagan Administration officials claimed that “fears of Iraqi aggression seem exaggerated,” only to look the other way two weeks later when Hussein’s forces used poisonous gas against Kurdish civilians in Halabja, known as Bloody Friday.

Secondly, it is hypocritical of the congresswoman to claim that President Obama wants to “blame somebody for his lack of resolve.” In an interview with The Miami Herald, she had a different attitude of the president’s desire to seek congressional approval:

“He needs Congress now because he wants someone to be with him. He’s standing there alone. We are standing there alone. He has ignored Congress for all of these years, has built no relations really to speak of with anyone in Congress in a strong way. And now he turns to us to give him authorization.”

Not only that, but she also said that she is “leaning toward approving targeted limited airstrikes,” which would, in her own words, say: “You can continue to kill your people, but buddy, use bullets don’t use gas…we’re going to be there a few days, we’re going to bomb a few targets and we’re going back and you, rebels, you sort it out.”

Now, I am no fan of President Obama lately, but Ros-Lehtinen’s apparent support for the president’s plan to action against Syria gives her no license to turn around and say that he is only using Congress as a scapegoat. What is funny is that she will probably vote in favor of striking Syria anyway, since she already has a record for being in favor of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

About Cristóbal Reyes

Cristóbal Reyes is a first-generation Chilean-American, a progressive political activist, and an aspiring political journalist. He studies Journalism and Political Science at the University of Central Florida and enjoys debating public policy and social issues.


One thought on “Top House Republican: Reagan Would Never Stand For Chemical Attacks

  1. The president did a great job of painting himself into a corner. Lucky for him John Kerry just drew another red line today.

    Posted by Mark | September 9, 2013, 5:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us on Twitter

Enter your email address to follow this site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 240 other followers


Join our growing list of financial supporters and sign up to donate $8 per month. Donate Button with Credit Cards

One-Time Donation

If you don't care to subscribe monthly, please consider making a one-time donation of any amount you'd like.

Register to vote!